Argument or Discussion?
Before
I started this course, when I heard the word argument, I pictured two people yelling
obscenities at one another and the argument possessing the potential of escalating
into a fistfight. After the third week
of completing the assignments in this course, my perspectives on the subject
were drastically changed. Now when I
hear the word argument, it brings to mind a couple of people, or a group of
people, having a civil and intelligent conversation with opposing viewpoints in
an attempt to come to some sort of agreement on their difference of opinions. This can be one party winning over the opponent,
or a mutual agreement on the issue. I
have also learned, taking a quote from our textbook, “Argument is everywhere”. (Wood, 2009) . We encounter this phenomenon every day of our
lives and are practically subjected to it, in one form or another, throughout
the entirety of any given day.
There are many types of
arguments. Now, when I hear the word
argument, I picture a consensual discussion among a group of people that have different
ideas, in varying degrees of rebuttal, on how to resolve an issue of great
importance. I have learned to analyze
these arguments and know what to look for within these arguments. I have learned to identify certain
argumentation strategies in order to understand what the argument is all
about. When I am analyzing an argument,
I should know whether I am interested in the issue within a reasonable amount
of time. If so, then to what degree? Do I totally agree, or am I reluctant to
accept certain concepts of the argument?
All of this is extremely important in order to arrive at a solution to
the issue. Some arguments do not require
a solution, they are there merely to persuade you to purchase their product, however,
it is still an argument because you may not agree with some of their
claims. Sometimes there is no solution,
but this will possibly help the audience to be better informed about the issue,
and to help them decide the importance of the issue and how critical it is to
resolve it. (Wood, 2009, p. 73)
It can also be very helpful to research
the background of the author. This may
help
to understand his or her intentions. I
also examine what constraints will develop in the audience because of this
argument. Will I be constrained to shut
out this argument completely or will it make me more agreeable with the argument? I am also concerned about the constraints of
the rest of the audience. (Wood, 2009,
p. 73)
The Toulmin model is useful in
analyzing an argument. It teaches you to
breakdown an argument into parts. If you
can understand the different parts, it helps you to grasp onto the whole of the argument. I will not include all the parts here, but
basically this model illustrates how to understand what the article is saying, recognize the sufficient information about the
argument, identify the evidence for support of the claim of the argument, and
locate sufficient warrant to back up all the above. (Wood, 2009, p. 73)
My instructor has helped me
tremendously in this course by supplying ample feedback on my assignments to
help me better understand these concepts.
I have learned that when you break something into parts, you will better
understand how these parts fit together and what their respective purposes are.
It also makes it easier to identify the
weak parts that need strengthening. I feel that this knowledge will help me in my
career because as I said, arguments are everywhere and you encounter them every
day. There is a reason for these
arguments and if you know what the reasons are, you are better equipped to
analyze the situation that they create. If
you know how to interpret these arguments you will better understand life in
general, because life creates the need for these arguments and how we
interpret, and react to, these arguments depends greatly on the knowledge we
have to analyze them efficiently.
References
Wood, N. (2009). Perspectives on Argument. Sixth Edition,Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
No comments:
Post a Comment